-48% $17.28$17.28
$3.99 delivery May 20 - 21
Ships from: powells_chicago Sold by: powells_chicago
$14.00$14.00
FREE delivery May 16 - 20
Ships from: Xcess Limited Sold by: Xcess Limited
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
The Norman Commanders: Masters of Warfare, 911–1135 Paperback – November 6, 2020
Purchase options and add-ons
Robert Guiscard, William the Conqueror, Roger I of Sicily, and Bohemond Prince of Antioch are just four of the exceptional Norman commanders who not only led their armies to victory in battle but also, through military force, created their own kingdoms in the eleventh and twelfth centuries. Their single-minded and aggressive leadership, and the organization, discipline and fighting qualities of their armies, marked them out from their Viking forebears and from many of the armed forces that stood against them.
Their brilliant careers, and those of Robert Curthose, William Rufus, Richard I of Capua and Henry I of England, are the subject of Paul Hills latest study of medieval warfare. In a narrative packed with detail and insight, and with a wide-ranging understanding of the fighting methods and military ethos of the period, he traces the course of their conquests, focusing on them as individual commanders and on their achievements on the battlefield.
The military context of their campaigns, and the conditions of warfare in France and England, in southern Italy and Sicily, and in the Near East, are vividly described, as are their decisive operations and sieges among them Hastings, Brmule, Tinchebrai, Civitate, Misilmeri, Dyrrhachium and the Siege of Antioch. There is no doubt that the Normans success in war depended upon the leadership qualities and military capabilities of the commanders as well as the special strengths of the armies they led. Paul Hills accessible and authoritative account offers a fascinating portrait of these masters of warfare.
- Print length240 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPen and Sword Military
- Publication dateNovember 6, 2020
- Dimensions6.1 x 0.7 x 9.1 inches
- ISBN-101526782014
- ISBN-13978-1526782014
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
ProtoView
“A masterpiece of historical research… an extraordinary and impressive work of meticulous scholarship that is further enhanced for academia with the inclusion of a four page Bibliography and an eight page Index.”
Midwest Book Review
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Pen and Sword Military (November 6, 2020)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 240 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1526782014
- ISBN-13 : 978-1526782014
- Item Weight : 1.25 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.1 x 0.7 x 9.1 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #4,262,225 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #7,691 in England History
- #29,396 in Military Leader Biographies
- #105,874 in Military History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Paul Hill has been writing history books about Anglo-Saxon, Viking and Norman warfare for eighteen years. His first solo publication in 2004 'The Age of Athelstan - Britain's Forgotten History' became a bestseller in a short space of time. Paul has explored the strengths and weaknesses of the western military powers of the medieval period in each of his books, but has recently branched into a long overdue analysis of how one particular crusading group (the Knights Templar) prosecuted their wars.
Paul has appeared on TV in 'Battlefield Detectives - Massacre at Waterloo' and 'Bloodbath at Hastings' in which he focused on the military consequences of the challenges of the landscape.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I found the lay-out a little confusing since many of the major engagements are dealt with a number of times over, depending on whether the chapter is dealing with Leaders, tactics, armour, etc. I would have preferred a more consequential historical dateline set-up. His summary & conclusions chapter at the end of the book I found to be well reasoned & very interesting.
For me the book is more suited to the scholar than the casual history buff. I would have liked to learn more detail regarding the principle commanders' personalities; but that is conjecture & not hard fact, & not the premise of this book.
There are however a number of glitches and imperfections which I want to briefly review (and get out of the way) before listing the numerous qualities of this book.
First, and contrary to the dates figuring in this book’s title (911 – 1135), the first battle mentioned (rather than covered) takes place in 1018 in Southern Italy. It was a Norman defeat. The last one was in 1126. What the 911-1135 dates cover in reality are foundation of the Norman County of Rouen and the death of Henry I, the last son of William the Conqueror. Norman participations in the early “Crusades” in Spain or the “Anglo-Norman” first conquests in Ireland are out of scope.
There are only six pages on the early days of the County of Rouen which then became the Duchy of Normandy. These form the book’s first chapter. They somewhat set the scene and contain a rather excellent map of the Duchy but do not describe any of the battles that took place in the Tenth Century.
Second, there are a number of little glitches, some of which may be editorial. For instance, Duke Richard II died in 1026, not in 1027. More problematic perhaps, Duke William (the future “Conqueror”) was not seven years old by 1046 (the year before the battle of Val-Les-Dunes). He was seven years old in 1035, when his father Robert died in Nicaea when returning from his pilgrimage, and was therefore eighteen or nineteen when the battle took place. Also, Roussel the Bailleul, the Norman mercenary who served Byzantium, revolted and carved himself a principality in the eastern part of Asia Minor before being beaten by Turks and subsequently captured was not present at the battle of Mantzikert in 1071, neither does he seem to have been executed by the Byzantines after he was captured in 1074 (not in 1077). There are a few more such little glitches and mistakes.
Nevertheless, the book has numerous qualities. It is the only single volume introduction and overview to Norman warfare and their commanders, and it is a rather good one. This result is achieved by drawing on all of the main and more specialised sources for the various sections, such as Morillo’s Warfare under the Anglo-Norman Kings (1066-1135) for Normandy and England, Graham Loud’s “The Age of Robert Guiscard” for Southern Italy and Byzantium, Douglas’ superb biography on William the Conqueror and Ann Hyland’s “The Medieval Warhorse from Byzantium to the Crusades”, among others. All titles above, and quite a few other key references, are mentioned in the short but good bibliography. One title that I was a bit surprised to not find was John France’s “Victory in the East’, which, as a military history of the First Crusade, is probably one of the best books to assess the quality of the general ship of Bohemond (the future Prince of Antioch) but also that of William Curthose, Duke of Normandy (and the eldest son of William the Conqueror).
Also worth mentioning is the quality of the illustrations and their abundance. This title contains a rather excellent and comprehensive collection of clear maps – some sixteen altogether spread across the whole book with a number showing campaign movements and maps of battles. Another half dozen drawings also provide possible reconstructions for some of the other engagements while a dozen of (somewhat simplified) family trees of Norman warlords provide the reader with their most important connexions. There are also some fifty photographs (some twenty in particular) of various monuments left by the Normans, including castles in England or Italy. Finally, there are ten very interesting and valuable boxes containing vignettes of much less well-known Norman warlords. These are mostly brothers, relatives, companions and main vassals of the commanders reviewed in more detail in discrete chapters and they are spread across the three first parts of the book.
The book is divided into four parts.
The first part contains two chapters on, respectively, the founding and early days of the Duchy of Normandy and the beginnings of the Normans in Southern Italy up to (and included) their rebellion against the Byzantines and their first territorial conquests in Apulia.
The second part contains eight chapters, each of which is centred on one Norman commander. They are equally divided between William the Conqueror and his three sons (William Curthose, William Rufus and Henry I “Beauclerc”) and the Normans of Southern Italy, starting with Robert Guiscard and Richard of Aversa who became Prince of Capua, but also Robert Guiscard’s brother (Roger who conquered and became Count of Sicily) and his eldest son Bohemond, the Crusader and first Prince of Antioch. Here again, and although the chapters are mostly good, there are perhaps a couple of names missing which have not received their own chapter – such as Tancred, Bohemond’s nephew who managed to hold and expand the Principality of Antioch – or have not been worthy of a box and vignette of their own – such as Tancred’s cousin, Roger of Salerno. This, again, is a minor quibble which does not detract from what has been achieved with this book.
The third part contains a selection of battles – six in the north and seven in the south (with three successive ones in 1041 being presented together). Many of these are little known and are their inclusion and description in a book targeted at the so-called “general reader” (as opposed to the scholar or student) is therefore all the more valuable. They are all victories, of course, although the author is both careful and honest enough to mention that the Normans were far from being always victorious, as the biographies of the various Norman commanders also show quite well.
The final part – another eight short and easy to read chapters - is devoted to the so-called “Norman Way of War”, with the author showing that it was not specifically Norman. It was in fact essentially the way wars were waged in the West during the 11th and early 12th centuries, except that the Normans seem to have been very good at it, and often better at it than others. Including in this part are valuable sections on the composition of the forces, on horses, logistics and supply, on training, leadership, discipline and strategy, with some particularly useful bits on the role of castles and the importance of sieges. The book then concludes by trying to explain why these huge successes occurred to the extent that they have been bunched together as part of a “Norman achievement”.
Whether you find the author’s explanations fully convincing or not, the book is certainly worth reading. Four and a half stars (rounded up to five).
Top reviews from other countries
There are however a number of glitches and imperfections which I want to briefly review (and get out of the way) before listing the numerous qualities of this book.
First, and contrary to the dates figuring in this book’s title (911 – 1135), the first battle mentioned (rather than covered) takes place in 1018 in Southern Italy. It was a Norman defeat. The last one was in 1126. What the 911-1135 dates cover in reality are foundation of the Norman County of Rouen and the death of Henry I, the last son of William the Conqueror. Norman participations in the early “Crusades” in Spain or the “Anglo-Norman” first conquests in Ireland are out of scope.
There are only six pages on the early days of the County of Rouen which then became the Duchy of Normandy. These form the book’s first chapter. They somewhat set the scene and contain a rather excellent map of the Duchy but do not describe any of the battles that took place in the Tenth Century.
Second, there are a number of little glitches, some of which may be editorial. For instance, Duke Richard II died in 1026, not in 1027. More problematic perhaps, Duke William (the future “Conqueror”) was not seven years old by 1046 (the year before the battle of Val-Les-Dunes). He was seven years old in 1035, when his father Robert died in Nicaea when returning from his pilgrimage, and was therefore eighteen or nineteen when the battle took place. Also, Roussel the Bailleul, the Norman mercenary who served Byzantium, revolted and carved himself a principality in the eastern part of Asia Minor before being beaten by Turks and subsequently captured was not present at the battle of Mantzikert in 1071, neither does he seem to have been executed by the Byzantines after he was captured in 1074 (not in 1077). There are a few more such little glitches and mistakes.
Nevertheless, the book has numerous qualities. It is the only single volume introduction and overview to Norman warfare and their commanders, and it is a rather good one. This result is achieved by drawing on all of the main and more specialised sources for the various sections, such as Morillo’s Warfare under the Anglo-Norman Kings (1066-1135) for Normandy and England, Graham Loud’s “The Age of Robert Guiscard” for Southern Italy and Byzantium, Douglas’ superb biography on William the Conqueror and Ann Hyland’s “The Medieval Warhorse from Byzantium to the Crusades”, among others. All titles above, and quite a few other key references, are mentioned in the short but good bibliography. One title that I was a bit surprised to not find was John France’s “Victory in the East’, which, as a military history of the First Crusade, is probably one of the best books to assess the quality of the general ship of Bohemond (the future Prince of Antioch) but also that of William Curthose, Duke of Normandy (and the eldest son of William the Conqueror).
Also worth mentioning is the quality of the illustrations and their abundance. This title contains a rather excellent and comprehensive collection of clear maps – some sixteen altogether spread across the whole book with a number showing campaign movements and maps of battles. Another half dozen drawings also provide possible reconstructions for some of the other engagements while a dozen of (somewhat simplified) family trees of Norman warlords provide the reader with their most important connexions. There are also some fifty photographs (some twenty in particular) of various monuments left by the Normans, including castles in England or Italy. Finally, there are ten very interesting and valuable boxes containing vignettes of much less well-known Norman warlords. These are mostly brothers, relatives, companions and main vassals of the commanders reviewed in more detail in discrete chapters and they are spread across the three first parts of the book.
The book is divided into four parts.
The first part contains two chapters on, respectively, the founding and early days of the Duchy of Normandy and the beginnings of the Normans in Southern Italy up to (and included) their rebellion against the Byzantines and their first territorial conquests in Apulia.
The second part contains eight chapters, each of which is centred on one Norman commander. They are equally divided between William the Conqueror and his three sons (William Curthose, William Rufus and Henry I “Beauclerc”) and the Normans of Southern Italy, starting with Robert Guiscard and Richard of Aversa who became Prince of Capua, but also Robert Guiscard’s brother (Roger who conquered and became Count of Sicily) and his eldest son Bohemond, the Crusader and first Prince of Antioch. Here again, and although the chapters are mostly good, there are perhaps a couple of names missing which have not received their own chapter – such as Tancred, Bohemond’s nephew who managed to hold and expand the Principality of Antioch – or have not been worthy of a box and vignette of their own – such as Tancred’s cousin, Roger of Salerno. This, again, is a minor quibble which does not detract from what has been achieved with this book.
The third part contains a selection of battles – six in the north and seven in the south (with three successive ones in 1041 being presented together). Many of these are little known and are their inclusion and description in a book targeted at the so-called “general reader” (as opposed to the scholar or student) is therefore all the more valuable. They are all victories, of course, although the author is both careful and honest enough to mention that the Normans were far from being always victorious, as the biographies of the various Norman commanders also show quite well.
The final part – another eight short and easy to read chapters - is devoted to the so-called “Norman Way of War”, with the author showing that it was not specifically Norman. It was in fact essentially the way wars were waged in the West during the 11th and early 12th centuries, except that the Normans seem to have been very good at it, and often better at it than others. Including in this part are valuable sections on the composition of the forces, on horses, logistics and supply, on training, leadership, discipline and strategy, with some particularly useful bits on the role of castles and the importance of sieges. The book then concludes by trying to explain why these huge successes occurred to the extent that they have been bunched together as part of a “Norman achievement”.
Whether you find the author’s explanations fully convincing or not, the book is certainly worth reading. Four and a half stars (rounded up to five).