Digital List Price: | $32.99 |
Kindle Price: | $18.14 Save $14.85 (45%) |
Sold by: | Amazon.com Services LLC |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
Audible sample Sample
The Race for Paradise: An Islamic History of the Crusades Illustrated Edition, Kindle Edition
In The Race for Paradise, Paul M. Cobb offers a new history of the confrontations between Muslims and Franks we now call the "Crusades," one that emphasizes the diversity of Muslim experiences of the European holy war. There is more to the story than Jerusalem, the Templars, Saladin, and the Assassins. Cobb considers the Arab perspective on all shores of the Muslim Mediterranean, from Spain to Syria. In the process, he shows that this is not a straightforward story of warriors and kings clashing in the Holy Land, but a more complicated tale of border-crossers and turncoats; of embassies and merchants; of scholars and spies, all of them seeking to manage a new threat from the barbarian fringes of their ordered world. When seen from the perspective of medieval Muslims, the Crusades emerge as something altogether different from the high-flying rhetoric of the European chronicles: as a cultural encounter to ponder, a diplomatic chess-game to be mastered, a commercial opportunity to be seized, and as so often happened, a political challenge to be exploited by ambitious rulers making canny use of the language of jihad.
An engrossing synthesis of history and scholarship, The Race for Paradise fills a significant historical gap, considering in a new light the events that distinctively shaped Muslim experiences of Europeans until the close of the Middle Ages.
- ISBN-13978-0199358113
- EditionIllustrated
- PublisherOxford University Press
- Publication dateJune 1, 2014
- LanguageEnglish
- File size4503 KB
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : B00KB1BRX2
- Publisher : Oxford University Press; Illustrated edition (June 1, 2014)
- Publication date : June 1, 2014
- Language : English
- File size : 4503 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 360 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #682,459 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #124 in Islamic History
- #391 in History of Islam
- #593 in History of Medieval Europe
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
This book has many strengths, least of which is the broader view taken as described above. More importantly, Cobb explains well the particular Islamic concepts of warfare, political legitimacy, the social contract, and theology that are necessary to understand how Muslims perceived these events. (Incidentally, these same concepts operate in our time too, but there are few non-academics who understand them, so there is much to be learned about modern Islamic society and culture as well.) This context is vital to the story and well worth the time to grasp.
The centerpiece of any good history is the people. There are lots of actors in Cobb's story, which gives it richness and makes it interesting. The anecdotes and stories show that civilizational differences really aren't so profound as we often assume . . . there is much continuity between societies engaged in the fundamentally similar pursuits called "life."
Other useful bits: the maps are generally good; the note on Arabic names is very interesting as is the list of characters, which is also useful as a quick reference to maintain one's bearings in the narrative. The notes are remarkable for their completeness, accuracy and as a guide for future reading. I would have liked to see more in the bibliographic sketch, which is a good opportunity to see what an author thinks the state of the field is with regard to publications.
So, you'll pick up this book to learn about the crusades, and you'll be rewarded with a lot more. Highly recommended.
The results of all this research turned my understanding of the rift between the European world and the east around completely.
Cobb's book is deep, provocative, healing and a terrific pleasure to read!
This in itself gives a lot of value to this book in several respects. It shows that the wars between Muslims and Christians and the “Reconquista” of territories lost by the latter started decades before the First Crusade. In particular, the Christians in Spain, with some help from those in France (and including some Normans) took Toledo some 14 years before the capture of Jerusalem, while Palermo, at one time one of the largest Muslim ports, fell to the Norman Hautevilles brothers some twenty seven years before. Interestingly, the author goes on well beyond AD 1291 and the fall of Acre.
Since he had chosen to adopt a Muslim point of view, he ends his book with a chapter on the Ottomans, with the fall of Constantinople soon to become Istanbul and the conquest of most of the Balkans, but also with the fall of Grenada and the end of the last Muslim state in Spain.
Another strongpoint is to show the impact and interactions of these events and the complex relationships between medieval Muslim states, between Christian states and between the two sets of states. Interestingly, even if not entirely originally, he clearly shows to what extent the success of the First Crusade was due to division among the Muslims themselves. He also shows that Saladin, the great hero of Islam (and for good reason) spent perhaps as much time subduing rival Moslem States than he spent actually fighting the Christians.
Another interesting, but much weaker, piece are the military, cultural and economic interactions and influences. It could have been interesting, for instance, to show to what extent these conflicts influenced military architecture and to what extent trade continued, despite the conflicts, especially between the Italian Republics and North Africa and Egypt. These interactions, however, are not entirely explored and only partly discussed. Another strongpoint, however, is the author’s clear descriptions and explanations of Islamic concepts related to Jihad, a Muslim’s duties, political legitimacy, Muslim Community, Muslim law and its sources and a number of other key notions that help to create Islamic civilisation up to our daws, and to understand how Muslims at the time might have perceived “Crusaders”.
In addition, the style is clear and rather engaging and the book is easy to read. Having praised this book, which is in fact the complement and opposite of one of John France’s books (“The Crusades and the Expansion of Catholic Christendom, 1000-1714”), I also had a few reservations.
A minor one is the existence of a couple of factual mistakes. For instance, and contrary to what the author claims, neither Kerak nor the Krak of Montreal fell to Saladin in 1182-83. They fell in 1188 and 1189, well after the disaster of Hattin (or the triumph of Hattin, from a Muslim perspective) after bitter sieges that last about a year in each case. However, Elyn, and more generally the control of the road from Egypt into Syria and Damascus along the shores of the Gulf of Aqaba, were lost in the 1170s to Saladin, allowing him to conquer his rivals in Syria and deprive the Crusader States of potential allies.
A slightly more serious point is that the author has little to say about the “other Christians”, starting with the Orthodox and the Byzantine Empire, and just about nothing about all the other Eastern Christians (Armenians, but also Maronites, Nestorians etc…). It would have been interesting to compare what Islamic sources had to say about them with how these sources (and the Eastern Christian sources) viewed the “Latins”. This, however, was slightly out of scope and not exactly the author’s purpose, although it would have shown that the “simple” opposition between “Latins” and “Muslims” in the East is a bit simplistic.
A final point is that, at times, I felt that the narrative was a bit too condensed or even rushed, presumably because of a page constraint imposed by the editor. To some extent, this is a bit of a pity, although it also means that I wanted more of it. Finally, there is a rather short annotated bibliography that the author terms a “sketch” but which contains many of the most recent titles on related topics. There are also, however, numerous endnotes that contain references with comments that are fit for anyone wanting to go further on some of the aspects that this book touches upon.
Four strong stars.
Top reviews from other countries
This in itself gives a lot of value to this book in several respects. It shows that the wars between Muslims and Christians and the “Reconquista” of territories lost by the latter started decades before the First Crusade. In particular, the Christians in Spain, with some help from those in France (and including some Normans) took Toledo some 14 years before the capture of Jerusalem, while Palermo, at one time one of the largest Muslim ports, fell to the Norman Hautevilles brothers some twenty seven years before. Interestingly, the author goes on well beyond AD 1291 and the fall of Acre.
Since he had chosen to adopt a Muslim point of view, he ends his book with a chapter on the Ottomans, with the fall of Constantinople soon to become Istanbul and the conquest of most of the Balkans, but also with the fall of Grenada and the end of the last Muslim state in Spain.
Another strongpoint is to show the impact and interactions of these events and the complex relationships between medieval Muslim states, between Christian states and between the two sets of states. Interestingly, even if not entirely originally, he clearly shows to what extent the success of the First Crusade was due to division among the Muslims themselves. He also shows that Saladin, the great hero of Islam (and for good reason) spent perhaps as much time subduing rival Moslem States than he spent actually fighting the Christians.
Another interesting, but much weaker, piece are the military, cultural and economic interactions and influences. It could have been interesting, for instance, to show to what extent these conflicts influenced military architecture and to what extent trade continued, despite the conflicts, especially between the Italian Republics and North Africa and Egypt. These interactions, however, are not entirely explored and only partly discussed. Another strongpoint, however, is the author’s clear descriptions and explanations of Islamic concepts related to Jihad, a Muslim’s duties, political legitimacy, Muslim Community, Muslim law and its sources and a number of other key notions that help to create Islamic civilisation up to our daws, and to understand how Muslims at the time might have perceived “Crusaders”.
In addition, the style is clear and rather engaging and the book is easy to read. Having praised this book, which is in fact the complement and opposite of one of John France’s books (“The Crusades and the Expansion of Catholic Christendom, 1000-1714”), I also had a few reservations.
A minor one is the existence of a couple of factual mistakes. For instance, and contrary to what the author claims, neither Kerak nor the Krak of Montreal fell to Saladin in 1182-83. They fell in 1188 and 1189, well after the disaster of Hattin (or the triumph of Hattin, from a Muslim perspective) after bitter sieges that last about a year in each case. However, Elyn, and more generally the control of the road from Egypt into Syria and Damascus along the shores of the Gulf of Aqaba, were lost in the 1170s to Saladin, allowing him to conquer his rivals in Syria and deprive the Crusader States of potential allies.
A slightly more serious point is that the author has little to say about the “other Christians”, starting with the Orthodox and the Byzantine Empire, and just about nothing about all the other Eastern Christians (Armenians, but also Maronites, Nestorians etc…). It would have been interesting to compare what Islamic sources had to say about them with how these sources (and the Eastern Christian sources) viewed the “Latins”. This, however, was slightly out of scope and not exactly the author’s purpose, although it would have shown that the “simple” opposition between “Latins” and “Muslims” in the East is a bit simplistic.
A final point is that, at times, I felt that the narrative was a bit too condensed or even rushed, presumably because of a page constraint imposed by the editor. To some extent, this is a bit of a pity, although it also means that I wanted more of it. Finally, there is a rather short annotated bibliography that the author terms a “sketch” but which contains many of the most recent titles on related topics. There are also, however, numerous endnotes that contain references with comments that are fit for anyone wanting to go further on some of the aspects that this book touches upon.
Four strong stars.